Scientists say... Powered by Trendolizer

Is no one else suspicious that Charles Murray doesn't actually have academic articles to his name? Only books?

Trending story found on www.longarticles.com
Is no one else suspicious that Charles Murray doesn't actually have academic articles to his name? Only books?
I have said before and documented well on this subreddit that Charles Murrays work is itself flawed and inherently biased. [http://www.nybooks.com/articles/1994/12/01/the-tainted-sources-of-the-bell-curve/](http://www.nybooks.com/articles/1994/12/01/the-tainted-sources-of-the-bell-curve/) https://www.reddit.com/r/samharris/comments/6gidnl/why_arent_we_discussing_charles_murrays_backing/ But it's quite obvious that charles Murray does not have academic Publications because he knows and has known since 1994 that by just publishing books he can avoid the entire process of peer review and having to actually interact with actual biology and geneticist experts not other mirror political scientists
[Source: www.longarticles.com] [ Comments ] [See why this is trending]

Trend graph:

Comments